Peer production and local governance through the Blockchain

Local Ledger - 29th March at Raylab, London with Lara, Lisa, Teresa, Alexei, Pete, Amit, Mikey, Ruth

These notes are incomplete - please improve - page 3
Blockchain depoliticises people. Alexei suggests that we repoliticise through a local radical technology. How do we mitigate the tendency to depoliticize? Freedom from fiat currencies - barter could be formalised, other examples include social currencies, barter, LETTS. Pete wonders about value of models to play with the implications of blockchain. People would commit to a certain kind of work, proof of presence, prove authenticity of something. Trust platform. We are looking for conflict (the engine of resolution and change). We are looking for social effects and ethics (given the theme of quantified self tech) part of an optimisation process.

Capacity - includes potential and actual

Exploration of probable conflict and possible futures.

Improvisation - Pete

Lara says that within an interaction design process - where you create a flow through a different set of information you develop a number of scenarios to test an idea. What you are observing with user tests are these exactly unscripted unknown reactions

Amit - what is the difference between improvisation and speculation? Pete is playing with different forms of organisation - collective practices and ways of working. A social act of cinema, a collaborative act of cinema.

Ruth talks about LARP

Role Play Your Way to Budgetary Blockchain Bliss

*** Institute of network cultures example link

Speculate

Next page >>